Skip to main content
Export agents in Myanmar

Export agents in Yangon

Providers serving Yangon, Myanmar. An independent listing for packers, growers and traders.

16 providers
A

Yangon rice miller and exporter shipping graded long, medium and short grain rice varieties to buyers across Europe, Africa, East Asia and Southeast Asia.

Export managementMarket access+1
R

Yangon rice export company operating milling facilities beside Yangon Port, part of a millers group exporting rice since the 1980s.

Export managementMarket access+1
A

Associated Seafoods Limited is the Scottish parent company of Lossie Seafoods and Moray Seafoods, processing smoked salmon and shellfish at sites in Buckie and Arbroath for customers around the world.

Export managementMarket access
BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety, AA Grade
1 facility
D

Darling Group grows, packs and exports fresh produce, connecting growers with global buyers through subsidiaries covering citrus, avocados and distribution across Australasia. Its produce includes avocados, citrus, blueberries, kiwifruit and mangoes.

Export managementMarket access+1
E

Eco-Fruits is a Hanoi-based tropical fruit exporter that sources from Vietnamese growers and its own farms, then exports to wholesalers in around 60 markets. It handles banana, durian, coconut, mango, dragon fruit and avocado, plus processed fruit, nuts and spices.

Export managementConsolidation+1
VietGAPGLOBALG.A.P.
1 facilityfresh fruits+3
F

Freshmax is a full-service produce marketer that sources, imports and exports fresh produce around the Pacific Rim, supplying customers on six continents. It handles apples, pears, avocados, bananas, berries, cherries, citrus, table grapes and durian, and develops proprietary varieties.

Export managementMarket access+2
bananas+1
M

Macduff Shellfish (Scotland) Ltd is a Scottish shellfish processor that harvests, processes and distributes scallops, langoustine, crab and whelk from its Mintlaw, Aberdeenshire facility to customers worldwide.

Export managementMarket access
BRCGS (British Retail Consortium) Global Standard for Food Safety, version 6
1 facility
M

Matipou Exports markets and exports New Zealand apples, combining fruit from its own packhouse with supply from other growers and packers. It handles Royal Gala, Premium Gala and NZ Queen varieties for export and domestic distribution.

Export managementConsolidation
S

Salix Fruits is a global fruit import and export company working with more than 80 producers across 18 countries and serving around 400 customers in 57 countries. It trades apples, citrus, pears, grapes and other fruit, and provides logistics and documentation support.

Export managementBuyer sourcing+2
T

T&G Global grows, markets and exports fresh produce, working with growers and distributors to sell in more than 60 countries. It is a major apple exporter with premium brands including Envy and Jazz, alongside kiwifruit and vegetables.

Export managementMarket access+2
2 facilitiesapples
A

Alvean is a sugar trading company with its Geneva trading hub at Esplanade de Pont-Rouge 4, Grand-Lancy, Switzerland, specializing in origination, commercialization and trading of raw and white sugar for bulk and bagged shipment by container and vessel, with staff across nine countries.

Export managementMarket access+2
C

COFCO International is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland and serves as the overseas agriculture trading arm of COFCO Corporation, buying, processing and distributing grains, oilseeds, sugar, coffee and cotton through warehouses, port terminals and processing plants in more than 30 countries.

Export managementMarket access+3
E

ECOM Agroindustrial Corp. Limited is headquartered in Pully, Switzerland and operates as a soft commodity trading group in coffee, cocoa and cotton, sourcing from more than 40 producing countries and running a dedicated risk management unit, ECOM Risk Management, for hedging and client risk advisory.

Export managementMarket access+3
G

Kaohsiung headquartered family owned seafood processor and exporter, incorporated in 1984, that ships tilapia, milkfish, barramundi, shrimp and other seafood products in bulk container volumes from eight production facilities across Asia to customers worldwide.

Export managementConsolidation+2
I

Singapore seafood trading firm offering export, brokerage and shipment documentation as a single point of contact for international buyers.

Export managementMarket access+2
S

Sucafina SA is a coffee merchant headquartered at Place de Saint-Gervais 1 in Geneva, Switzerland, founded in 1977, sourcing green coffee from origin countries in Africa, Latin America and Asia and supplying roasters worldwide through washing stations and farmer certification programs.

Export managementMarket access+3

Need a provider in Yangon?

Send one request and we will pass it to relevant providers here.

Operate in Yangon?

This is an independent listing compiled from public information. Listings are not endorsements, and Fernable has no commercial affiliation with the providers listed.

Common questions

Does an export agent handle documentation as well as transport for a shipment from Yangon?

Most do both, but the split varies by provider, so confirm it rather than assume it. Ask specifically whether they prepare the export documentation themselves, coordinate with a customs broker on your behalf, or expect you to supply completed paperwork for them to act on. The answer changes what you need to arrange elsewhere, and it is worth settling before a shipment from Yangon is booked rather than once it is already moving.

How is cargo from Yangon in Myanmar typically routed to its onward transport?

Routing depends on the cargo, the destination, and the mode chosen for that particular shipment, not on a fixed pattern for Yangon. An export agent will usually have a standard way of moving consignments from a given origin, but it can change between sea, air, and combined routings depending on timing and value. Ask the provider directly which gateway and mode they plan to use for your shipment rather than assuming a default.

What should I confirm with an export agent before booking a shipment out of Yangon?

Confirm what they actually arrange themselves versus what they subcontract, where their responsibility for the cargo begins and ends, and how they communicate delays or problems once a shipment is underway. Ask for a realistic timeline for this specific shipment rather than a general one, and check how documentation is handled alongside the physical movement, since a gap between the two is a common source of delay at either end.

Why does a provider without a badge marking it as based in Yangon still appear on this list?

Listings on this page are matched by where a provider actually operates, not only by registered address. Some providers cover Yangon from a nearby base, run scheduled routes through it, or serve it as part of a wider territory in Myanmar. The absence of a city badge simply means their presence there is regional rather than a dedicated local office, so they remain a genuine option worth contacting for work in Yangon.

How does this Yangon page relate to the country page for Myanmar above it?

The country page for Myanmar gathers every provider working anywhere within it, across every category, while this page narrows that same pool down to Yangon specifically. Think of it as a filtered view rather than a separate dataset. If a search here comes up thin, the country page is the right next stop, since it will surface providers whose coverage reaches Yangon without being centred on it.

What should I do if the provider I need is not listed in Yangon yet?

Start with the country page for Myanmar, since a provider covering Yangon without a dedicated local presence may be listed there rather than here. If nothing suitable turns up, check neighbouring city pages, as providers often serve overlapping areas. You are also welcome to point us to a provider you know operates in Yangon so it can be reviewed and added for others searching the same route.

How does a provider get listed for Yangon?

Providers are added after their operations in or around Yangon are checked against publicly available information, such as their own website, registration details, or other verifiable records confirming the work they do in Myanmar. This keeps the list something buyers can rely on rather than a self-reported directory. A provider already known to serve Yangon that is missing here can be flagged for review and added once that basis is confirmed.

Reading a Yangon listing for what it does and does not tell you

A provider naming Yangon on a listing is stating where it can be reached and, usually, where its staff are based. That is a real and useful fact: it tells you this is a location the provider has chosen to be findable in rather than one it happens to touch in passing. It does not tell you the size of the team there, how long that provider has operated in Yangon, or whether the specific service you need is handled locally rather than routed to a colleague elsewhere in Myanmar. A city name on its own carries less information than it looks like it does.

It is easy to read more into a listing than it states, particularly when comparing several providers side by side and looking for a quick way to rank them. Resist filling gaps with assumptions. A provider listed against Yangon might run a full local operation or a single point of contact who coordinates work done elsewhere; both are legitimate ways to serve a location, but they are not the same offer, and a listing rarely distinguishes between them on its face.

Treat the listing as the start of a conversation rather than the answer to it. Confirm directly what is actually done in Yangon versus what is coordinated from elsewhere, who you would be dealing with day to day, and how long that arrangement has been in place. None of this is unreasonable to ask, and a provider with nothing to hide will answer plainly. A hesitant or evasive answer to a direct question about presence is worth more than the listing itself, in either direction. Providers who have nothing to hide tend to answer these questions quickly and specifically, because they answer them often; it is the vague or delayed response, not the shape of the arrangement itself, that should raise a question about how a provider in Yangon actually operates.

Working out the routing for Yangon

Fernable does not hold a mapped routing for Yangon, which is not a statement about what kind of place it is or whether it sits on a coast. Establishing the actual gateway a consignment will move through is a normal first step wherever a route is not already on record, and it starts with the cargo and the deadline rather than with assumptions about geography. Work out which mode fits: sea freight for heavier, less time-sensitive volumes, air freight where value density or a tight delivery window justifies the cost, and in some cases a combination across a single shipment, with one leg moving by one mode and a connecting leg by another. From there, the realistic gateway is whichever port or airport the export agent actually books through for a given lane, which is a question for them directly rather than something to infer in advance from where Yangon appears on a map.

Put that question to the export agent plainly: which gateways they use for consignments originating in or near Yangon, how the cargo gets from Yangon to that gateway, and where their own arrangements stop. An export agent may run the onward leg themselves, hand it to a named partner they manage, or expect it to be organised separately, and each of those changes what you need to check and when. Ask what happens if a first-choice routing falls through close to a deadline, whether an alternative gateway or mode is available, and how much notice that would need. Treat the answers as the actual routing for this shipment rather than a general description of how the export agent usually works, since the right gateway can vary by cargo type, timing, and destination even from the same origin.

Comparing providers who are all genuinely local

Once several providers are all genuinely present in the same place, being local stops being the thing that separates them, because on that measure they have already cleared the same bar and a shipper gains nothing further by weighing it again. What is worth comparing instead is what each one actually does with that presence: which trade lanes and destination markets they handle regularly rather than occasionally, which product categories or compliance regimes they have real depth in, and how they communicate during a shipment rather than only at the point of booking it. Two providers can both be based locally and still differ sharply in responsiveness, in how proactively they flag a problem before it becomes urgent, and in how much they involve the exporter in decisions along the way, differences that only become visible once you stop treating local presence itself as the deciding factor.

It is also worth asking each one directly what handling a shipment through this specific location typically involves for them: which agents, hauliers, or terminal contacts they routinely work with here, and what a typical timeline looks like once cargo is ready to move. A provider that has been established locally for a long period is not automatically better matched to a given shipment than one newer to the area, and the number of providers listed for a place says nothing about how well any one of them will perform on a particular consignment. The comparison worth making is between the specific capabilities and working style of the providers in front of you, not between the fact that they are all local, which by this point tells you very little on its own.

What tends to go wrong on a first job with a new provider

Most first-job problems trace back to an assumption one side made and never said aloud. A provider assumes a document will arrive in a particular format; the customer assumes it will be produced for them. A provider assumes a delay will be flagged immediately; the customer assumes it will be absorbed without comment. Neither side is being careless, but the gap between the two assumptions surfaces exactly when there is least time to close it.

The checks that catch this early are simple and easy to skip under time pressure. Confirm, before work starts, exactly who is responsible for each step rather than assuming it is obvious from the nature of the job. Ask how the provider communicates when something changes, and whether that happens automatically or only if you ask. Get a plain answer on what happens to cost and timing if a detail shifts partway through, since this is the point where informal arrangements tend to break down into disagreement.

A second common failure is scale mismatch: a provider used to smaller or larger volumes than yours may handle a first job adequately but reveal strain once it becomes routine. Watching how a provider manages the first job, not just whether it was completed, tells you more about how the tenth job will go. Ask what they would have wanted to know in advance that they did not, and treat a candid answer as a good sign rather than a red flag.

Finally, resolve how disagreements will be handled before there is one to handle. A provider willing to specify this upfront, in plain terms, is telling you something useful about how they operate under pressure, which is exactly the situation a first-job problem creates. The providers worth keeping are rarely the ones who never have a first-job problem; they are the ones who handle it without drama when it happens.

How trade and export services are distributed across Myanmar

Myanmar's trade activity is heavily weighted toward a single dominant commercial centre, with most other cities functioning as feeders into that centre rather than as independent gateways in their own right. This concentration means that providers based in the main hub typically offer the widest range of services and the broadest onward connections, while providers elsewhere are more often specialised around collecting and consolidating goods for transport toward that hub. It is a pattern common to countries with one clearly dominant city, and it means comparing a smaller city to the hub on service breadth alone will usually understate what the hub offers, since scale there is structural rather than incidental.

That concentration does not mean smaller cities lack useful services, only that their role in the chain is different. A provider outside the main hub is often the right choice for the first leg of a movement, collection, local handling, and preparation for onward transport, while the hub itself is where consolidation, documentation and international departure tend to happen. Two secondary cities can differ considerably depending on how well connected each is to the hub, whether by more established road links or by proximity to a river or coastal route, and that connectivity matters more for planning than raw distance does.

For Yangon, it is worth establishing early how goods from the area typically reach the main hub and how consistent that connection is, since this affects lead times more than most other factors. A city with well-used, frequent transport links to the hub will generally support tighter scheduling than one that depends on less frequent or more seasonal routes. Storage services, ambient or otherwise, are commonly used in secondary cities precisely to smooth over these gaps in transport frequency, holding goods until a suitable onward movement is available.